Best & Worst Cadillac CTS Years

We've ranked each Cadillac CTS model for every generation so you can avoid picking the worst Cadillac CTS years and go for the best Cadillac CTS years.

Ready to uncover the Cadillac CTS’s finest and worst years? Buckle up!

We’re diving deep into this opulent sedan’s history, using hard data from NHTSA and Consumer Reports to separate the gems from the lemons.

From engine roars to tech toys, we’ll cover it all – including those pesky recalls and common problems.

Want to find your dream CTS or avoid a costly mistake?

Let’s hit the gas!

Related:Best & Worst Cadillac SRX YearsBest & Worst Cadillac Escalade YearsBest & Worst Cadillac XT5 Years

Table of ContentsShow

Cadillac CTS Generations

The 2003 Cadillac CTS wasn’t just a new car – it was Cadillac’s luxury sedan revolution. This first-gen model was a head-turner, blending eye-popping design with heart-racing performance.

With potent engines under the hood and a tech-loaded interior, it wasn’t just another luxury sedan. It was Cadillac’s bold statement: they could mix high-octane thrills with plush comfort like no one else.

Here’s a snapshot of CTS generations from 2003 to 2019, when the CT5 took over:

GenerationYears
1st Generation (GMX320)2003-2007
2nd Generation (GMX322)2008-2013
3rd Generation2014-2019

Getting a grip on these generational shifts is like having a roadmap to the best (and worst) of the CTS lineup. Each era brought its own flavor of improvements and, let’s face it, sometimes a few hiccups. This knowledge is your secret weapon in hunting down the perfect CTS that won’t leave you stranded or breaking the bank.

Cadillac CTS Best, Neutral, and Worst Years

Alright, let’s get down to brass tacks. When we’re sizing up the Cadillac CTS across its lifespan, we’re not just kicking the tires. We’re digging deep, looking at a whole buffet of factors to separate the wheat from the chaff. Here’s what we’re chewing on:

  • The word on the street (owner surveys)
  • How much it’ll cost to keep it purring (annual maintenance)
  • How well it’ll protect your hide (safety ratings)
  • The experts’ take (Consumer Reports reliability and satisfaction scores)
  • The official red flags (NHTSA recalls, investigations, and complaints)
  • What the drivers are saying (ratings from Edmunds, JD Power, KBB, VehicleHistory, and Cars.com)

Buckle up, because we’re about to lay it all out in a graph that’ll show you the CTS’s ups and downs faster than you can say “zero to sixty.”

Cadillac CTS Car Smite Score Combined Overall Score

We’ve sorted each model year into the good, the bad, and the “meh” based on our deep dive. Check out the breakdown:

GenerationBest YearsNeutral YearsWorst Years
1st Generation (GMX320)2007N/A2003
2004
2005
2006
2nd Generation (GMX322)2010
2011
2012
2013
N/A2008
2009
3rd Generation2016
2017
2018
2019
20152014

Now, those ‘Neutral Years’? They’re the ones that didn’t exactly set the world on fire, but didn’t leave us icy either. Think of them as the “It’s complicated” relationship status of cars – not terrible, not fantastic, just… there.

Keep in mind, when NHTSA starts handing out recalls like candy on Halloween, that’s usually a red flag for reliability. More complaints and recalls? That’s car-speak for “Proceed with caution.”

Alright, let’s pop the hood and see what makes each Cadillac CTS generation tick – or sputter.

Best & Worst Years for Cadillac CTS 1st Generation (2003-2007)

Cadillac CTS 1st generation 2003 model
The 2003 Cadillac CTS

The 2003 Cadillac CTS burst onto the scene like a rockstar, ready to shake up the luxury sedan world. It was Cadillac’s way of saying, “We can do sporty and swanky.” But let’s be real – this first generation had its share of growing pains.

If you’re eyeing a first-gen CTS, here’s the lowdown: most of these early birds are more trouble than they’re worth. But if you’re dead set on it, 2007 is your best bet. It’s like the senior year of the first generation – they finally figured some stuff out.

The Best Year: 2007

Why does 2007 take the crown? Let’s break it down: (No changes were made to this text as it contains no adjectives that could be safely replaced without potentially altering the meaning or context.)

Engine options? You’ve got choices. There’s the 2.8L LP1 V6 that’ll give you 210 horses to play with, or you can step up to the meatier 3.6L LY7 V6 that kicks out 255 hp. Either way, you’re getting some substantial oomph.

Transmission-wise, you’re looking at a 5-speed auto or a 6-speed manual if you like to row your own gears. Fuel economy? It’s not winning any green awards at 16 city/25 highway mpg, but hey, it’s not terrible for its time.

Tech-wise, the 2007 model stepped up its game. The infotainment got a facelift, and safety features like beefed-up stability control and better airbags made it a safer ride.

Now, it wasn’t all sunshine and daisies. There were some recalls for leaky rear axle seals. But overall, the 2007 model was like Cadillac finally got the recipe right after a few years of trial and error. It was more dependable, more refined, and just a better all-around luxury ride than its predecessors.

The Worst Years: 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006

Now, let’s talk about the years you might want to steer clear of. The 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 models? They’re the troublesome offspring of the CTS family.

The 2003 model was like a first pancake – not quite right. Electrical gremlins could leave you stranded, and the transmission had a mind of its own sometimes. And don’t get me started on the recalls – ignition switch issues and brake hose corrosion were just the tip of the iceberg.

The 2004 model? It was like Cadillac said, “Hold my beer” and added fuel pump overheating and rear axle seal leaks to the mix. And just when you thought it couldn’t get worse, 2005 and 2006 rolled in with fuel gauges that deceived you and rear differentials that decided to call it quits.

Consumers weren’t shy about their disappointment either. These models got slapped with low ratings on VehicleHistory and Cars.com. The message is clear: unless you’re a glutton for punishment or a hardcore DIY mechanic, these are the years to skip.

Want the nitty-gritty on what went wrong?

Check out the NHTSA recalls and complaints for the 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 Cadillac CTS. It’s an inventory of “yikes.”

Best & Worst Years for Cadillac CTS 2nd Generation (2008-2013)

Cadillac CTS 2nd generation 2008 model
The 2008 Cadillac CTS

The second-gen Cadillac CTS rolled onto the scene in 2008, ready to show the world that Cadillac could learn from its mistakes. This generation was like the CTS hitting the gym, getting a makeover, and enrolling in some tech classes all at once.

Here’s the quick and dirty: 2010-2013 are the golden years of this generation. If you’re shopping, these are the ones to circle on your list. But 2008 and 2009? Let’s just say they’re like that experimental phase you’d rather forget.

The Best Years: 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013

Why are these the cream of the crop? Let’s break it down:

Engine options? You’ve got some serious choices. The 2010-2011 models offer a 3.0L V6 that’ll give you 270 horses to play with. But if that’s not enough, how about the 3.6L V6 that cranks out a whopping 318 hp? That’s enough power to make you forget you’re driving a luxury sedan.

All these engines come paired with a smooth 6-speed automatic transmission. And fuel efficiency? The 3.0L model will get you about 18 mpg in the city and 27 on the highway. Not too shabby for a car that can move like this.

Safety-wise, these models don’t mess around. You’re looking at electronic stability control, anti-lock brakes, and enough airbags to make you feel like you’re driving a cushioned room.

Step inside, and you’ll see why they call it luxury. High-quality materials, an infotainment system that doesn’t require a PhD to operate, and audio systems that’ll make you feel like you’re at a concert. Plus, you’ve got options galore with various trim levels.

These years really hit the sweet spot. They ironed out the kinks from the early years, ramped up the quality, and packed in enough features to make tech geeks drool. If you’re in the market for a second-gen CTS, these are the years to target.

The Worst Years: 2008, 2009

Now, let’s talk about the years that might give you more headaches than happiness. The 2008 and 2009 models? They’re the ones you might want to swipe left on.

These early birds of the second generation had some growing pains, mostly in the electrical department and under the hood. Owners reported all sorts of electrical gremlins – warning lights playing hide and seek, and engines that seemed to have a mind of their own, misfiring and stalling like they were having fits.

The 2008 model even got hit with a recall for its heated windshield washer module. Apparently, it had a propensity to short circuit, which is not exactly a characteristic you want in a luxury car.

And just when you thought it couldn’t get worse, the 2009 model said “hold my beer” and threw timing chain failures into the mix. That’s the kind of problem that can turn your smooth ride into an expensive paperweight real quick.

Want to see the horror stories for yourself?

Check out the NHTSA recalls and complaints for the 2008 and 2009 Cadillac CTS. It’s like a prime collection of automotive woes.

Best & Worst Years for Cadillac CTS 3rd Generation (2014-2019)

Cadillac CTS 3rd generation 2014 model
The 2014 Cadillac CTS

The third-gen Cadillac CTS strutted onto the scene in 2014, flaunting a sleek new look and enough tech to make Silicon Valley jealous. This generation was Cadillac’s way of saying, “We’re not just keeping up with the Joneses, we’re leaving them in the dust.”

Here’s the lowdown: if you’re shopping for a third-gen CTS, aim for the 2016-2019 models. These are the years when Cadillac really hit its stride. But 2014? Let’s just say it’s the black sheep of the family.

The Best Years: 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019

Why are these the crème de la crème? Let’s dive in:

Engine options? You’ve got a smorgasbord of power to choose from. There’s the efficient 2.0L LTG Ecotec turbo four-cylinder that pumps out 268 hp. Not enough? How about the 3.6L LGX V6 that cranks out 335 hp? Still want more? The Cadillac CTS-V’s 6.2L LT4 V8 delivers a tire-smoking 640 hp. That’s not a car engine, that’s a rocket with wheels.

All these powerplants are mated to a slick 8-speed automatic transmission, giving you a ride smoother than a buttered slide. And fuel efficiency? The 2.0L engine will get you about 21 mpg in the city and 30 on the highway. Not bad for a car that can outrun your neighbor’s sports car.

Safety features? These models are packed tighter than a clown car. We’re talking adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and automatic emergency braking. It’s like having a guardian angel riding shotgun.

Step inside, and you’re entering a world of luxury. Premium materials everywhere you look, an infotainment system that’s actually intuitive, and customizable ambient lighting that lets you set the mood. It’s like a rolling VIP lounge.

These years represent the CTS at its peak. They ironed out all the kinks, cranked up the luxury factor, and packed in enough tech to make you feel like you’re driving in the future.

The Neutral Year: 2015

Now, let’s talk about 2015. It’s not bad, but it’s not excellent either. It’s the “meh” of the CTS world.

The 2015 model has a lot in common with its stellar successors. Same engine options, same transmission, robust safety features, and a rather swanky interior. So why is it just “neutral”?

Well, it’s like that movie sequel that’s good, but not quite as good as the original. It didn’t quite nail the refinements of the later models, and the tech package was a bit behind the curve compared to what came after. It’s not going to let you down, but it might not knock your socks off either.

The Worst Year: 2014

And now, the year you might want to steer clear of: 2014. This model year is like that one friend who’s always causing drama – you love them, but they’re exhausting.

The 2014 CTS racked up more recalls than a faulty toy factory. The main culprit? Powertrain issues. Owners reported rear differential failures that had their cars sounding like a cement mixer and smelling like a burnt BBQ.

But wait, there’s more! Recalls for this year included problems with the chassis electronic control module (complex words for “the car’s brain”), transmission shift cables deciding to go AWOL, and windshield wipers that apparently didn’t get the memo about their job description.

All these issues combined to make the 2014 model about as reliable as a chocolate teapot. It’s the kind of car that might have you on a first-name basis with your local mechanic.

Curious about the gory details?

Check out the NHTSA recalls and complaints for the 2014 Cadillac CTS. It’s like a “what not to do” guide for car manufacturers.

Cadillac CTS Resale Values

Cadillac CTS Average List Price

This graph isn’t just a bunch of squiggly lines – it’s your crystal ball into the future value of different CTS models. It’s like a financial roadmap for CTS shoppers, showing you which years might be a treasure trove and which might leave your wallet feeling emptier than you’d like.

Conclusion

Let’s wrap this up! Want a CTS that’ll make you grin? Go for 2010-2013 or 2016-2019 – the honor roll years. Steer clear of 2008, 2009, and 2014 – these troublemakers might leave you stranded. And those early first-gen models? Only for die-hard collectors or masochists.

But hey, I want to hear your CTS stories! Adore it? Hate it? Got a tale that’ll make us chuckle or cry?

Spill it in the comments! Your experience could be the deciding factor for a fellow CTS shopper.

Let’s navigate this used car maze together!

Relevant For You

The Best and Worst Years For Mazda CX 5
Best & Worst Mazda CX-5 Years
Jonathan Eckert

Jonathan is an ASE-certified mechanic with over 22 years of hands-on experience in the automotive industry. His expertise spans a wide range of vehicles, but he specializes in diagnosing and repairing Japanese cars. His previous workplace highly commended his meticulous attention to detail, and that's exaclty what he uses at Car Smite to craft the best guides for each purpose.